Friday, April 9, 2010
No More Piracy?
Opening Day in Baseball
Opening Day ticket prices have soared into the hundreds and thousands just for one ticket and the average person cannot afford this. In fact, tickets for the entire season have been raised to such a level that most people can go to maybe one game a year, if that. Baseball has become a game that only the rich can attend and that the even richer play.
Baseball is the only major sport in the US that does not have a salary cap. It has what's called a "luxury tax," where if teams go over a certain amount, than they have to pay a fee to smaller teams. This is a system that supposedly helps the smaller market teams that cannot compete with New York, Boston, and Los Angeles. But there is no hard salary cap, or ceiling, that teams cannot go over. So for all intents and purposes, a team can have a $500-million salary -- buying up the best player at every position -- and it would just pay a lot of money to the smaller teams at year's end.
What this has done, aside from create a massive inequality in teams in the MLB, is jack up prices across all stadiums. The new Yankee Stadium does not have a ticket for under $100. That means even the worst outfield seat is still about $100. This is absurd for a baseball game. You can no longer grab a friend, get some beers and hot dogs, and watch a game for cheap.
For the new Yankee park, it's been said that there are over a million millionaires on Long Island, so thats a huge market to pay only $100 for a baseball game. But what about all the fathers and sons who want to watch the game as a vacation ticket? The middle class is being phased out of baseball and that's very unfortunate.
The topic of a salary cap will come up soon for Major League Baseball. The inequality in the teams across the league is too great right now and it will ultimately hurt baseball. There needs to be some parity in the league, which a salary cap will help. But a cap will also help fans. It will help reduce ticket prices, increase player loyalty to individual teams, and create an altogether better dynamic for the sport.
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Wooo-hooo! Spring break!

Spring break can get really expensive, as my roommates and I figured out while trying to figure out where to go. You have to worry about housing, transportation, food/alcohol, and incidental costs. Personally, I will have to spend a lot of money on sunscreen because my skin seems to reject sunlight and a high SPF is really expensive. Do they want me to burn?
However, I digress. We basically decided to go for the bargain spring break, which means cheap hotel (with a kitchen), location that was within driving distance, and -- on a personal level -- plenty of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.
When we were booking things, I realized that however annoying our extremely late spring break can be occasionally, it does save us money. First, W&L students don't have to go to Mexico, the Caribbean, or somewhere in the deep south to find a warm beach. Second, our break is so off of "SPRIIIIING BREEEEAAAAK!" season but still before summer that we get cheaper hotel rates. (In fact, our hotel was a full 40 bucks more per night during the peak of the season.) W&L's weird schedule saved me a significant amount of money.
Also, we will have the entire beach to ourselves, which I prefer (more room for sandcastles). So anyone in Panama for spring break come and find us. The trick to finding me on the beach is to follow the sounds of "Panama" by Van Halen and to look for the blinding beacon of my paleness. Oh, how I wish parasols were still in style.
--Michelle Hirschfeld
Monday, April 5, 2010
Throw the Book at Them
We’ve tackled music, movies, and TV. We’ve touched on fashion, festivals, and the Final Four. Now it’s time for Econotainment to set its sights on another sector of the entertainment world: books.
Groan.
For months, Apple’s iPad has loomed on the horizon, with retailers drooling to let customers light up the screens of the company’s new tablet device. So far, the response has been mild, as the figures trickle in. The Los Angeles Times reports that the Cupterino, Calif. company sold more than 300,000 iPads on Saturday, the day the device finally saw the light of day. (And this doesn’t even factor in the 1 million apps and 250,000 e-books that have been downloaded since then.) And while some experts say that the response to the iPad has been only lukewarm, there’s no denying what some of the numbers say about the publishers of trade books: they’re in trouble.
From 2004 to 2007, print book sales stalled around $24 billion, according to figures from the Census Bureau. Alternately, the International Digital Publishing Forum shows the e-book sales have grown exponentially during the last five years. And I read on Yahoo! News today that Borders is about ready to call it quits.
Peter Olson, a senior lecturer at Harvard Business School, has heard the groans from these publishers. In an illuminating Q&A on the institution’s Working Knowledge Web site, Olson suggests that in order to keep people reading, publishers ought to embrace technology rather than press their noses in a paperback.
“I think the fundamental issue is not the rate of adoption of the e-reader, or whether publishers will survive in their current form, or what their role will be in the future,” Olson explains. “The fundamental question at the very bottom of this is, will people read books at all?”
That’s a terrifying proposition, and not just because, as an English major, I’ve spent the last four years perfecting the art of reading books (as if such an “art” could ever be perfected). I might not recall the atomic mass of Sodium or what a polynomial is, but I do remember the name of Holden Caulfield’s brother and the words that Sydney Carton speaks at the end of "A Tale of Two Cities" (For the record, he declares, “It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known.”) Reading has opened my eyes and sharpened my mind and, like many people, I’m genuinely afraid of what might happen to it as publishers trade pencils for touch-screens. But I have hope that despite the industry’s suffering, the J.D. Salingers and Charles Dickenses of the future are still typing away somewhere.
And even though my cynicism about Twitter knows no bounds, this is still pretty hilarious.
--Michael Morella